|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
| Villas, Farmsteads & Villages | ||||
The
archaeological definition of a villa
is that of a wealthy rural residence with a number of 'romanized' attributes
such as mosaics,
bathhouses, painted plaster, tesselated floors, sculpted columns and other
stonework. Although exhibiting a large degree of variation, they generally
fall into a recognised category of ground plan, with the most common being
a 'winged corridor' type such as the model shown below. They are often
accompanied by a range of outbuildings and enclosures, as befits their
usual status as the centre of an agricultural estate. Sussex
is unique within Britain, in having a significant number of large villa
complexes belonging to the 1st century AD. These were probably constructed
by members of the tribal aristocracy during the period of the client kingdom,
and may have been the centre of tribal sub-units units, or pagi
(see Administration
& Society). The large early villas were strikingly different to any
form of architecture seen before in Britain, and would have had a substantial
impact upon the landscape. It is likely that they were used by the elite
as a form of Romanized conspicuous display, designed to enhance their
prestige and power within society. |
||||
As
the client kingdom became absorbed into the province, the number of villas
increased, so that there are around thirty known examples from the 2nd
century AD, and undoubtedly many more waiting to be discovered. These
later villas were generally of a more modest nature than those of the
1st century, and probably represent a rise in the number of landowners
who had benefited financially from integration into the Roman state. During the 3rd and 4th centuries, many of the coastal villas declined and/or were abandoned, including that at Fishbourne. This may have been because of increased insecurity, both from internal struggles within the empire and from external barbarian raids. Further inland however, villas such as Bignor, Chilgrove and Up Marden were being enlarged and improved at this time, perhaps representing the return to a smaller number of very wealthy landowning families. |
||||
| Many of the Sussex villas developed from earlier native farmsteads, particularly those located in areas of good agricultural land, and with communication routes, such as Chilgrove. Smaller farms were to be found throughout most parts of southern Sussex in the Roman period (i.e. from the coastal plain to the upper greensand), and were probably the domestic dwellings of poorer independent or tenant families. They often show a distinct continuity from the later Iron Age, implying that the basic units of land tenure were not always altered by the Roman conquest. | ||||
| In some places, such as Thundersbarrow, there have been found groups of domestic and agricultural buildings - probably representing a number of family units - that may be termed 'villages'. However, sites like Park Brow, where boundary ditches, pits and five rectangular buildings have been found, may actually represent a group of structures or 'rooms' which had different functions, but belonged to a single family. If this were the case, then the total structural space of these separate 'rooms' would not be very different from some small villas. Indeed, at Park Brow, the presence of window glass, ceramic roof tiles and painted plaster suggests that there was not always a great distinction between villas and other farmsteads. | ||||
|
|
||||
|
HOME
| TEACHERS
| THEMES | SEARCH
| MUSEUMS IN SUSSEX | OTHER
WEB SITES | SUSSEX
PAST SHOP
ABOUT THIS SITE | FURTHER READING | LEVEL 1 | LEVEL 2 | LEVEL 3 |
||||